The California real estate market offers magnificent opportunities to create a highly profitable real estate portfolio, but the legal landscape here also creates unique challenges. One notable issue involves the treatment of real estate professional status (REPS), which California handles differently than the federal government and many other states. These differences can lead to financial implications that investors need to understand before building or expanding their real estate portfolios in California.
Federal Law vs. California Law Handling of Real Estate Professional Status (REPS)
At the federal level, qualifying as a real estate professional offers significant tax advantages. It allows eligible taxpayers to offset passive rental losses against other ordinary income (such as wages), which can lead to substantial tax savings. However, California does not follow these federal rules at the state level. Even if you meet the federal qualifications for REPS, the state still considers all rental activities as passive, meaning you cannot use these losses to reduce other taxable income on your California return.
Federal law establishes strict criteria for qualifying as a real estate professional. To achieve REPS status, a taxpayer must meet the following requirements:
- Spend at least 750 hours annually in a real estate trade or business in which they materially participate.
- Spend more time on real estate activities than any other occupation.
- Meet material participation standards in real estate activities, which generally require actively managing properties rather than hiring a management company.
A crucial federal rule affecting REPS classification is the 30-day rule. If a taxpayer leases a property for fewer than 30 days and materially participates in its management, it can qualify as non-passive for federal tax purposes, potentially increasing tax savings. This is a key distinction for short-term rental operators seeking to utilize REPS benefits at the federal level.
This disconnect between state and federal tax treatment means California real estate investors must navigate two different tax systems—an added layer of complexity that demands careful planning.
Federal Tax Savings and Exceptions for REPS
The federal tax benefits of REPS can be significant. By classifying rental losses as non-passive, qualifying taxpayers can fully deduct rental losses against their ordinary income. Without REPS, rental losses are generally limited to $25,000 per year for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) under $100,000, and this deduction phases out entirely for MAGI over $150,000.
Additionally, there are specific exceptions to passive activity loss limitations or special rules under federal law:
- Short-term rentals: If the average stay per tenant is less than seven days, or if the taxpayer provides significant personal services (e.g., daily cleaning, concierge services), the rental activity may be treated as non-passive.
- Grouping election: Taxpayers may group real estate activities with other trades or businesses under certain conditions to meet material participation standards.
- Real estate professionals who do not qualify under REPS may still claim deductions for mortgage interest, depreciation, and other expenses that reduce taxable rental income at the federal level.
These federal regulations and guidelines can provide relief for taxpayers who do not meet the REPS standards outright but still engage actively in real estate management.
Tax Implications of California’s Handling of REPS
California’s unique tax treatment of real estate extends beyond REPS. For instance, the state does not allow federal bonus depreciation, which lets investors accelerate tax deductions for property purchases. Instead, California requires its own depreciation schedules, often resulting in higher compliance costs. Maintaining separate records for state and federal purposes is not just an administrative burden; it can also lead to unexpected tax liabilities.
Another significant challenge is California’s “clawback rule” for 1031 exchanges. While 1031 exchanges allow investors to defer federal capital gains taxes by reinvesting proceeds into similar properties, California imposes taxes on any gain that accrued during the property’s ownership within the state—even if the property is exchanged for one outside California. This rule effectively ensures that the state captures its share of taxes on California-based investments, no matter where your portfolio grows.
Lastly, California’s top marginal income tax rate of 13.3%—the highest in the nation—can significantly impact high-income earners. Whether your income is derived from rental properties, a business, or capital gains from real estate sales, the state’s aggressive tax policies can increase your overall financial burden. Some investors even consider relocating to avoid these rates, but California is known for pursuing taxes aggressively, even after individuals have moved out of state.
Protecting Your California Real Estate Investments
Successfully navigating California’s tax treatment of real estate investments and the applicable federal laws requires careful planning and a solid understanding of state-specific rules. Mistakes in the way you structure your California real estate investments can lead to unexpected liabilities, diminished returns, and increased administrative costs. Whether you’re expanding your portfolio, planning a 1031 exchange, or reviewing your overall tax strategy, working with a knowledgeable legal partner can help you safeguard your investments.
Contact Dahl Law Group at our offices in Sacramento or San Diego to discuss how we can assist with your real estate and tax planning needs.
Dahl Law Group
Latest posts by Dahl Law Group (see all)
- Complications of Real Estate Professional Classification in California - February 24, 2025
